Well, this time you don't actually need an 'Intro' column because it has already been "said" in the technical review of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (NV35) Graphics Adapter in the HARDWARE LABORATORY department on this site. So, first of all, it's recommended to read the technical review here. To know the details of the drivers setup (it's strongly recommended for you to know the exact video card configuration) for the video chip before seeing its tested in this department, read the article 'NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (NV35) Drivers Setup' in the SOFTWARE EXCLUSIVE department - here. After reading these articles, you are fully "equipped" with all the required knowledge for this benchmark testing.
First, let's take a look at the testing configuration.
Processor - Intel Pentium 4 3066
MHz (HT=ON)
Mainboard - ASUS P4G8X (iE7205)
RAM Memory - 1024 MB DDR SDRAM Memory;
Hard Drive - Seagate Barracuda IV 40GB;
Software Environment - Windows XP SP1;
DirectX 9.0a.
Monitors -
Drivers Configuration - NVIDIA Detonator FX
44.03 (VSync - off, textures compression in applications - off)
The following video chips' results are provided for a comparison analysis:
Reference card NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
(500/500 (1000 DDR) MHz, 128 MB)
ATI RADEON 9800 PRO (380/340 (680 DDR) MHz, 128 MB, driver
6.307)
3D Graphics
3D Graphics is used for 100% applications in our modern World :-)). So the results shown in this category of benchmarks are considered to be the most important when talking about the video adapter performance. I decided to add no comments, because everything has to be clear for you :-).
3DMark2003
I decided to sort benchmarks by the system name they are from. So all the 3DMark2003 benchmarks are presented below:
TO CONTINUE LOOKING AT 3D GRAPHICS BENCHMARKS CLICK HERE !!!
